imagemap

SMASHING PUMPKINS IN TORONTO, 1996

Since I live in Toronto, I thought it was appropriate to have this page, a collection of sorts. Below you'll find four things: my review of the 2 Jan 96 show at the Phoenix; an ATN review of the 3 Jan 96 Phoenix show; a transcript of Smashing Pumpkins on MuchMusic on 3 Jan 96; my review of the Maple Leaf Gardens show, 14 Sep 96.


Smashing Pumpkins
The Phoenix, Toronto. January 2 1996.
By Simon Coyle (note: this review first appeared on ChartAttack)

I was cold. Very cold. So cold that when I tried to speak, drool spilled from the side of my blue mouth. Looking around I could see that many people in The Phoenix that night were suffering from the same problem, but that was alright. It was the first big show of 1996 - Smashing Pumpkins' club tour, a little surprise for their hard-core fans. We had queued patiently, and without complaint, in sub-zero temperatures. Twice. Even if Billy Corgan had marched onstage, pissed into a bucket and said goodnight, we would still have a good time. We had earned our places in the audience, dammit, and we were rabid.

Eager mumblings and the odd scream were the only sounds heard until guitarist James Iha leapt out from behind the drum kit. The Phoenix came dangerously close to collapse as the rest of the band took the stage: Billy Corgan, bassist D'arcy Wretzky and drummer Jimmy Chamberlin - all of them dressed in their pyjamas. The crowd went wild. "We're our own opening band," explained Corgan as the band took their seats for what turned out to be an incredible acoustic set. Highlights were Tonight Tonight and Rocket. The former was amazing - slowed, hushed and beautiful. The latter, while blatantly non-acoustic (ie. the instruments were plugged in), was also superb - completely rewritten from it's original 1993 Siamese Dream incarnation and well, it was just plain exciting. The set went without a hitch, despite some moshers who were, yes, moshing to very slow acoustic songs ... weirdos. Anyway, by the end of the forty-minute set, the audience was going nuts, they were thirsty for more stripped-down lovliness. But it wasn't to be. The Pumpkins buggered off backstage to change clothes. And when they came out again, they were not the same band.

Well, they were the same band, but they also weren't. For you see, the people that had left the stage were quiet, introverted and whimsical. The people that took the stage at the start of the next set were psycho-cyber-metallers, here to kick our asses (in a musical way) with the help of some very loud guitars and shiny silver pants. And that's just what they did. Beginning by launching straight into the mangled feedback of Where Boys Fear to Tread, Smashing Pumpkins powered their way through an awe-inspiring set at breakneck speed. There was a hardly a moment to catch a breath as the cock-rock Bullet with Butterfly Wings blasted into Thru the Eyes of Ruby, melted into Porcelina of the Vast Oceans which then spawned the crowd-pleasing rock of Jellybelly.

After that, things slowed down a tad with the chart-friendly 1979. After a couple of encores, things ended on a high note with Cherub Rock and that was that. Smashing Pumpkins had left that building. And as for me, I went home with a buzz that lasted two days. Or that could have just been my ears ringing.


Smashing Pumpkins
Phoenix Concert Theatre
Toronto, Canada
January 4, 1996 (note: this date is incorrect)

By Peter Howell

It's 5 p.m. and the audience earlybirds shivering outside the Phoenix Concert Theatre are getting a thrill: the members of Chicago's Smashing Pumpkins showing up for a pre-concert sound check. The fans press close to the vehicle carrying the band, their small flash cameras popping souvenir shots, while band member Billy Corgan, Jimmy Chamberlin, James Iha and D'Arcy shyly smile and slip into the building, anxious to prepare for the second of two sold-out shows.

The Pumpkins seem embarrassed by the attention, and they don't look like rock stars, with the exception of bassist D'Arcy, the glamour doll of the group in her styled blonde hair and shiny leather pants.

Backstage in the dressing room, which is stocked with such rock 'n' roll essentials as champagne and such whimsical requests as Skippy peanut butter and Pez candy dispensers (D'Arcy's personal favorite), Corgan and Chamberlin seem even less like the nouveau rock royalty they've become. For one thing, Corgan is wrapped in a big winter coat and toque, snuffling away at a cold. "Right now, I'm on codeine, ecchinacea, cortisone, antibiotics ... I don't even know what I'm taking. I'm just like Elvis," he quips.

A viral infection for the lead singer/guitarist at the start of a world tour would be a nail-biting concern for many bands. But it doesn't seem to worry this extremely focused group, which gives the impression of having thought out every move so well, no explanation or justification bears mention. But Corgan, 28, and drummer Chamberlain, 31, are happy to at least try to explain it all, including the band's decision to begin its Phoenix shows with a sit-down acoustic set, rather than straight balls-out rock 'n' roll.

The Smashing Pumpkins, after all, are a hot, hot ticket, having sold out the 1,100-person Phoenix twice over, for a show that would have done healthy business at Maple Leaf Gardens hockey arena or even the SkyDome stadium. And the band is currently at the top of the alternative rock heap, with an audacious double album, Mellon Collie And The Infinite Sadness, that has sold 3,000,000 units ญญ triple platinum ญญ in Canada alone since its October release.

So why the take-it-easy show start? The simple answer is they won't be able to do much acoustic playing this summer, when they return to Toronto for a big outdoor show on another leg of the tour aimed at amphitheaters and stadiums. "We know we could come here and play to how-many-other people, but that's not what we're interested in," Corgan says.

Adds Chamberlin, who often intuitively finishes Corgan's sentences: "This is as much for us as it is for everybody else."

"We have one eye on being entertaining, and another eye on satisfying our own need to go out and fully enjoy the material that we worked so hard to present," Corgan continues. "Because the fact of the matter is, it's exactly what you're saying: the moment we do go into those big places, we'll never play most of the stuff that you heard last night."

Toronto is one of only a handful of cities where the Pumpkins are doing small club shows to warm up for their one- to two-year global trek. It's in recognition of the fact that Canada, and Toronto in particular, is one of the best markets in the world for the Smashing Pumpkins, Corgan says. It's some change from 1991, when the Pumpkins were the opening act on an amazing bill at the old Concert Hall, that included the Red Hot Chili Peppers and the local debut of Pearl Jam. At that show, Corgan became angry with the crowd for something he now can't recall, and showered the audience with verbal abuse. He admits he's mellowed a lot since then, both towards Toronto ญญ he judged Tuesday's first-night crowd "excellent" ญญ and his audiences in general. "My basic negative reactions were to apathy or bad attitude," he says, "so I would respond to it in kind."

Corgan has since learned to be patient, which is why he didn't fly off the handle when the punkers in his Phoenix audience screamed for ear-bending rock during the acoustic phase of the show. He and his bandmates have together learned to work together more and to hold their ground, putting on the show they want to do. "We're not asking for tolerance," Corgan says. "We're basically saying, 'Here's what we are, all facets of it,' and if people don't like certain facets of it, well, there's not much we can do about that."

The "all facets" philosophy explains why Mellon Collie has 28 tracks and two discs. Corgan and Chamberlin both say there was exactly one band meeting to decide whether to put out another single-CD album of rock, like 1993's ground-breaking Siamese Dream, or to push the band's limits with what became Mellon Collie, a sprawling monument to creativity with its rock, classical, jazz and pop mix, and acoustic/electric dual personality. "And we never looked back," Corgan says, a satisfied smile on his face.

Does Mellon Collie show all sides of the band? Chamberlin, for one, thinks so: "I think it's about as close as we can get, really, without either killing ourselves or having to quit."

But Corgan seemed unconvinced: "I think this is the crowning achievement of Smashing Pumpkins as people would know it, but I think we're still capable of making a universal album. "We're still capable of making an album that would appeal to your grandma and a 15-year-old kid, and which nobody would have a problem with ญญ the kind of album R.E.M. and U2 make."

A brash claim, but anyone who has followed the Smashing Pumpkins on their seven-year odyssey would know better than to disbelieve it.


Smashing Pumpkins on MuchMusic, Wednesday
January 3rd, 1996.
Transribed by Simon Coyle

Band enters studio. Lots of screaming.)
MuchMusic: James has left the building...
D'arcy: You're all actors, right?
MM: Yes that's right, high paid extras.
Billy Corgan How come you're not all in school, that's what I want to know. The future of Canada is at stake!
MM: There should be a revolving platform or something you guys should stay on. How is everyone? All right?
D: We're all sick.
MM: Bearing the cold? Oh, you're all sick, I see.
D: Bringing you new viruses from other countries.
MM: Oh that's always good, bring on the viruses. Ok, so I saw you play last night, and what struck me first about the show would be the amazing long line-up down the street and the use of vouchers instead of tickets. And mandatory i.d to eliminate scalping. Why did you use this method?
BC: We played some shows last February in Chicago, same kind of situation, small show and you know, certainly there's more than whatever number of people want to go to the show and we wanted people who really wanted to go to get there and the problem is like, when you put it through TicketMaster or whatever you have here for phonelines, you're gonna get people who are like, kinda fans like they like one song kinda thing and we're trying to make it like, if people really wanna go they can get a ticket. I mean, if you want to get up and stand in line, you'll get a ticket, you know...
MM: Right it's sort of a task to make it...
(lots of screaming from fans outside the buildling)
MM: They want tickets!
BC: A little late. But, see that's the idea and then just take the scalping element out of it so, if you're sixteen and you have you know, whatever amount of money, you're gonna get in. You don't have to pay so many hundred bucks plus...
D: Or have, you know, connections.
BC: Right, you know, I mean, at this point in our lives we'll play a show and there'll be a hundred people there who have nothing to do with the music band, and not the people who want to see you play, it's just 'cos their dad knows Larry the Sausage Guy or something, you know. So we try to avoid that.
MM: Was it true that you waited till the last person in the line-up was inside the building before you started the show?
BC: I think we tried, we tried. But we had a... I dunno. Somebody had a heart attack or something...
MM: Really? In the line-up?
BC: No, us, one of us had a heart attack. We were a little late going onstage.
MM: And you started the show off with a twenty minute acoustic set.
BC: It was more like forty
MM: Was it about forty?
BC: It seemed like an hour and a half.
MM: It seemed like a real bold move to do that, and why did you choose that, starting the night off with that style?
Jimmy Chamberlin: Um, just because it's a rare opportunity for us to play our softer acoustic songs without, you know, without having to play an extremely long show, I mean, to break it up into two things, it's easier to present, like, these are our acoustic songs, so don't expect like, you know, a big raucous rock show, that'll be later.
MM: Yeah, it looked like you were in your pyjamas to begin with and you had like a beautiful elegant ball gown...
D: We were... and we'll be in our pyjamas again.
BC: I thought it was appropriate to wear my pyjamas considering I wrote most of the songs in them so...
MM: It seems very, like, in that very stripped-down manner, without the signature guitars that it really emphasised the fact that a lot of your songs are love songs.
BC: What kind of songs?
MM: Love songs.
BC: We call them hate songs
MM: And the night sort of progressed on to, it started off very controlled and quiet and by the end of the show you were all deranged! Like crazy! (To D'arcy) Like, your eyeliner is going down your face, blaaagghhhh...
James Iha: I don't remember that...
MM: You had like, shinier stuff on...
JC: You were at a different show...
MM: Then comes the magnus opus of the double CD, Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness. Did you start off with conceptually going, we wanna put out a double CD or did you just have so much stuff that it fit onto two CDs?
BC: Both. No, it was a double CD before the songs were even written.
MM: So the idea...
BC: We made up our minds because we're so sick of everyone doing these extremely calculated rock moves and, this is how you do your videos and this is how you do your albums, and this is how you are as a band, and this is what you say. So it's just a total reaction against the way that everything is. We just wanted to provide the most amount of music that we could, for the least amount of money and just...
MM: The least amount of money - like as far as what you pay for it?
BC: Yeah, I mean, the album roughly costs one and a half times a normal album instead of two albums put together. You know, we took less money and worked harder to make something that we cared about. And our whole thing has always been if we care about it, we hope that other people would too. So you know, we're just trying to remove ourselves out of the typical rock game, circa 1995 or 6 or whatever...
MM: And you can call the shots now at the point in your career. Or have you always done...
BC: Well yeah, you can call the shots as long as you can sell records. I mean, the moment we stop selling records I don't think anyone would be too supportive of a double CD.
MM: It's divided into two parts, Dawn till Dusk and Twilight to Starlight, how did you determine which songs fell into which time period?
BC: Well we put the really good ones on one and the bad ones on the other.
MM: Really?
JI: Really?
MM: Which are the really good ones according to you?
BC: See, you have to guess that part though. Because everyone has a different opinion.
MM: Yeah, I found it very consistent. It was very hard for me to determine what was the deciding force that... you know. Umm, you speak... ahh... your songs are introspective, emotional and turbulent, are you able to..
BC: They are?
MM: They are! Are you able to speak freely as a person about these things or are songs what you choose to... is that the best...
BC: Oh, you're asking me can I speak about the same subject matter outside of the context of the songs?
MM: Yes.
BC: Yeah I can, but it seems to demean the subject matter.
MM: So it's more effective?
BC: It's not about effectiveness, it's just you know, ok, if I write songs, you know, I'm as much of an artist as much as someone who paints a picture and I choose to express in those things whatever I want to express. Nobody questions an artist's emotional attitude in a painting or in a picture but somehow musically we have to dissect where it comes from, so I've just ceased talking about those things in public because it seems to cheapen them or something and I'm not gonna cheapen what's real because everyone that I know feels the things that we're singing about so until I find somebody who doesn't feel those things then we'll not be invalid. The media makes these things invalid,it blows them up into, you know, I'm the tortured idiot child who doesn't know any better, you know, and I'm not the tortured idiot child, I'm a pretty normal human being, I just happen to be able to express things very intensly. That's it, it's not any more sophistcated than that.
MM: So to demean your songs is to talk about what the songs are about?
D: Not to talk about them, but you know, but Billy could sit there and talk for about an hour about what a song really means to him and maybe he'll sum it up really well, but they're not gonna put everything that he says in there, they're gonna try and sum it up in three really catchy words. And that definitely trivialises it.
BC: It's a soundbite culture and we're not interested in participating in a soundbite culture.
MM: Do you ever find yourself in interviews regurgitating the same answers like, a lot of artists...
BC: Every answer is original and fresh.
MM: Yeah, that's good. Now this album finds you playing more together as a live band, does that more reflect a change of dynamics within the group? Sort of a relinquishing of technical precision for just groove and feel?
BC: I think we felt overall we never really captured the band as the band on record. Maybe Gish to a point, but even then it was still like, you know, first album freak-out. So this album certainly captures, like, all aspects of the band you know, the anal geek part and the total just rocking-out part.
MM: Um, you made an interesting observation about the parallels between like, Hendrix and Coltrane and Sinatra and Miles Davidson. You said something, "great music completely obliterates any conception of genre" and do you wanna kind of elaborate on that?
BC: I dunno how much better I can say it.
D: You said that? Wow.
MM: So these people were like venturing into new musical territory...
BC: Take a great artist, Bob Dylan or John Lennon or Kurt Cobain or anybody like that, when they come along it doesn't matter what style of music they're playing, suddenly what they're singing about and what they're talking about suddenly seems so much more important than grunge or... whatever. And that's what, all I'm trying to say is we so focus on what's 'happening', it's like, by the time you recognise that something is 'happening', it's probably already ceased to happen. The very root of grunge was Seattle 89/90 you know. We saw that and you could feel that. By the time it became this huge media event, everyone had already gone on and moved on.
MM: You've been very critical about the state of contemporary music and how do you as a group continue to challenge yourself and it seems very important for you to make new music - how do you do that?
JI: Uuuh...
BC: James?
MM: Are you in isolation most of the time? Do you keep up on contemporary music?
JI: I don't think we really listen to new bands like the new alternative rock bands, we sort of work within the records we've already done and sorta go from there. The songs always come first but I think like stylistically we try to just build from our previous records and not rehash what we've done before.
MM: Are you hard on each other?
D: But we're also really hard on ourselves. I mean I think we all have that perfectionistic attitude.
MM: You keep saying the word 'real' and real is like a subjective thing - but what is 'real' for you?
BC: But I don't think it is subjective, it may be subjective to the individual, but speaking in general terms, real things seem to resonate through a lot of people and umm... I mean you know, we're all playing party to something and you could be a pissant about it, which I try not to always be, but the fact of the matter is that the people who are coming to see us play deserve more. Not only from the Smashing Pumpkins but from everyone they pay their money to. If the audience is expected to give of themselves then the artists should be expected to give of themselves and what disgusts me is it's more about image and manufacturing some kind of intent to actually getting down to providing what the whole point of it is, which is a visceral experience that has meaning, so that twenty years from now you look back on what you listened to and you wouldn't be ashamed. We look back at what we used to listen to when we were fifteen and it was terrible, it was totally awful. And we're proud to at least provide something of quality and of realness to the people who are listening and what disgusts us is like you know, there's people can look themselves in the mirror then go out and fake their way through it.
MM: You've said that this is the end of the Smashing Pumpkins era as a rock 'n' roll guitar based band, you're moving into the technological direction. Do all of you embrace your electronic future?
BC: You might wanna ask D'arcy that question.
MM: So are you gonna get into computers like (starts making computer-noises)?
BC: We already are, though computers don't make that noise any more.
D: Not our computers.
MM: So like, what are you going to do?
BC: We've worked out a plan where eventually we'll replace all ourselves with machines. So roughly by the year 2002 we'll sit at home and the machine will go on tour.
D: James isn't really James. He's a robot.
BC: That's why he's not as funny as he used to be.
MM: Do you have a lot of input in your videos?
JC: No.
BC: Yes.
MM: You do? I would imagine the videos are sort of like, you try to get the same amount of quality in there or input 'cos that's like a part of you that out on show.
BC: Well whenever you make a commercial you know, you want it to be good. We try to make the best commercials we can.
MM: Specifically this one's an interesting one, like the post-apocalyptic imagary of all the people, these throngs of people covered in blue mud and then the band. And is the band part of that group of people? Are you part of that whole scenario or are you like...
BC: We're the house band for the armageddon.
MM: Ok, here they are, this is the house band for the armageddon, Smashing Pumpkins, and this is Bullet with Butterfly Wings, thank you.


Smashing Pumpkins
Maple Leaf Gardens, Toronto. September 14 1996.
By Simon Coyle (note: this review first appeared on ChartAttack)

Having possibly been spoiled by the Pumpkins show at The Phoenix last January (where they played to only 900 people), I was slightly apprehensive about how they were going to carry off this stadium show. But, predictably enough, I shouldn't have worried, as The Smashing Pumpkins gave one of the loudest, and most visually stimulating shows I've ever seen.

Knowing that they could never recreate an intimate club atmosphere in a place like Maple Leaf Gardens, the band seemed to have gone all the way to the other extreme. They weren't just playing songs, they were putting on a show - and what a great show it was. It began by plunging Maple Leaf Gardens into total darkness, then playing the very soft instrumental title track from their latest album, Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness over the speakers. The atmosphere around this point was reaching fever pitch, and I could feel a mass-stadium freakout coming on. Then, as the track drew to a close, the lights went up and - good lord - there was an enormous (enormous) metal christmas tree, just kind of, sitting there. Strobe lights flashed, spotlights spun and shone down from the tree-thing, dry ice drifted over the stage and the band exploded into Where Boys Fear to Tread, a Sabbath-esque cock-rock riffathon.

Between-song banter was strangely thin on the ground, but the force of the music more then made up for this. There were a few definite highlights, the main one being the first encore where they introduced Jimmy from Milwaukee "sleaze-queens" The Frogs, whose drummer took over as Pumpkins keyboardist for the remainder of this tour. He appeared onstage in his full Frogs garb - green sequined suit and giant shining wings, and sang Some Kind of Wonderful. During the next song, 1979, he dived into the crowd, chased bassist D'arcy around the stage, attacked Corgan with a swinging microphone and generally lightened the tone.

Another highlight was the third encore. It began with drummer Matt Walker (from Filter, replacing Jimmy Chamberlin for the rest of the tour) taking the stage alone, and doing his thing. He was following by the other band members, who then launched into a 25-minute version of Silverfuck. Yes, it was completely self-indulgent, but it was also brilliant.

Moshing on the floor was kept to a minimum, but that didn't stop the three people next to me trying to mosh in their seats. God, there's some strange people out there...